Difference between revisions of "VICTORY Act"

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 42: Line 42:
 
*Charles Levondosky, [http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2003/08/26/editorial/columns/43eaf1c60e39b638bd067e2ce550a758.txt Victory Act would be no victory for public], ''Casper Star-Tribune'', August 26, 2003.
 
*Charles Levondosky, [http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2003/08/26/editorial/columns/43eaf1c60e39b638bd067e2ce550a758.txt Victory Act would be no victory for public], ''Casper Star-Tribune'', August 26, 2003.
 
*[http://www.libertythink.com/2003_09_07_archives.html#106325888262673060 VICTORY Act - Orwellian theater hits fevered pitch on 9/11 eve], September 7, 2003. Archived at ''Libertythink''.
 
*[http://www.libertythink.com/2003_09_07_archives.html#106325888262673060 VICTORY Act - Orwellian theater hits fevered pitch on 9/11 eve], September 7, 2003. Archived at ''Libertythink''.
*[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.R.3037: H.R. 3037]: [[Antiterrorism Tools Enhancement Act of 2003]] introducted in House of Representatives, September 9, 2003.
+
*[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.R.3037: H.R. 3037]: [[Antiterrorism Tools Enhancement Act of 2003]] introduced in House of Representatives, September 9, 2003.
 
*[http://www.libertythink.com/victory.htm Beltway conservatives slam Hatch on VICTORY Act], ''Salt Lake Tribune'', September 15, 2003.
 
*[http://www.libertythink.com/victory.htm Beltway conservatives slam Hatch on VICTORY Act], ''Salt Lake Tribune'', September 15, 2003.
 
*[http://www.talkleft.com/archives/004771.html The 'Victory Act' Details], ''TalkLeft'', November 22, 2003: "With the bill expanding Patriot Act rights moving full speed through Congress this week, people sound surpised--as if they thought things were going to get better. We think they will get worse. The Victory Act has yet to be introduced, but that doesn't mean it's dead."
 
*[http://www.talkleft.com/archives/004771.html The 'Victory Act' Details], ''TalkLeft'', November 22, 2003: "With the bill expanding Patriot Act rights moving full speed through Congress this week, people sound surpised--as if they thought things were going to get better. We think they will get worse. The Victory Act has yet to be introduced, but that doesn't mean it's dead."

Revision as of 13:52, 2 March 2004

The VICTORY Act ("Vital Interdiction of Criminal Terrorist Organizations Act of 2003") was introduced in the 108th Congress, 1st Session, by Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) and co-sponsored by Senators Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), John Conryn (R-Texas), and John Kyl (R-Arizona). DRAFT June 27, 2003[1].

The purpose of the bill is "To combat narco-terrorism, to dismantle narco-terrorist criminal enterprises, to disrupt narco-terrorist financing and money laundering schemes, to enact national drug sentencing reform, to prevent drug trafficking to children, to deter drug-related violence, to provide law enforcement with the tools needed to win the war against narco-terrorists and major drug traffickers, and for other purposes." [2]

The Victory Act is, perhaps, a watered-down version of The Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003 or Patriot Act II. (See full text of the DRAFT Act, January 9, 2003.) [3]

According to Warblogging.com, "it may be a little tamer than the DSEA '03. [but what] we do know, however, is extremely troubling." [4]

James Gordon Meek, in the August 6, 2003, New York Daily News article "Ashcroft tour to plug terror bill" announced that Attorney General John Ashcroft was "hitting the road to rally support for the Victory Act, which would further expand his powers to go after Al Qaeda and narcoterrorists ... If passed, the feds would be allowed to: [5]

  • Clamp down on Arab hawala transactions, where cash exchanged in an honor system has been funneled to terrorists.
  • Get business records without a court order in terrorism probes and delay notification.
  • Track wireless communications with a roving warrant.
  • Increase sentences for drug kingpins to 40 years in prison and $4 million in fines." [6]

The National Consumer Coalition Privacy Group called the Victory Act "a grab-bag of enhanced police-state powers." [7]


SourceWatch Resources

External Links

Undated Resources

Dated Articles