Difference between revisions of "Cancer United"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-(?ms)^(.*)$ +{{Front groups}} \1)) |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-(?ms)^(.*)$ +\1 Category:Needs review)) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*David Miller '[http://www.spinwatch.org/content/view/3525/29/ This campaign brought to you by...]' ''Spinwatch'', 29 October 2006. | *David Miller '[http://www.spinwatch.org/content/view/3525/29/ This campaign brought to you by...]' ''Spinwatch'', 29 October 2006. | ||
[[Category:Health]][[Category:Pharmaceutical industry]][[Category:Europe]][[Category:Front groups]] | [[Category:Health]][[Category:Pharmaceutical industry]][[Category:Europe]][[Category:Front groups]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Needs review]] | ||
Revision as of 14:48, 10 January 2008
 |
This article is part of the Center for Media & Democracy's spotlight on front groups and corporate spin. |
Cancer United is a drug company front group established by Weber Shandwick and funded entirely by Roche.
Contact Details
Web: http://www.cancerunited.org/
SourceWatch Resources
- Health Care
- Midwest Heart Foundation
- Doctor Run Charities
- Patient Groups/Australia
- Patient Groups/Europe
- Patient Groups/International
- Patient Groups/UK
- Patient Groups/US
- Patient Groups/Canada
External Links
- Sarah Boseley, "Concern over cancer group's link to drug firm", Guardian (UK), October 18, 2006.
- Faisal Islam , "Roche faces cancer probe", Channel Four, October 19, 2006.
- Sarah Boseley and David Gow, "Support for cancer group naive, says MP", Guardian (UK), October 20, 2006.
- Sarah Boseley, "Hiding behind the patients: Of course drug companies have a voice in the debate about cancer care. But they should be more open about it", Comment IS Free (Guardian blog), October 20, 2006.
- David Miller 'This campaign brought to you by...' Spinwatch, 29 October 2006.
