Difference between revisions of "Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen"

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(SW: paradoxical attitude to scientific expertise in climate science)
(SW: add ref tag)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
*Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, "[http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/z011.htm Climate Change: the World Bank, Global Environment Facility and the United Nations - Partners or Competitors in Global Environmental Governance?]", from ''Global Warming'', ed. [[Julian Morris]], [[Institute of Economic Affairs]], 1997
 
*Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, "[http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/z011.htm Climate Change: the World Bank, Global Environment Facility and the United Nations - Partners or Competitors in Global Environmental Governance?]", from ''Global Warming'', ed. [[Julian Morris]], [[Institute of Economic Affairs]], 1997
 
*Paul D. Thacker, "[http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2005/aug/policy/pt_skeptics.html  Skeptics get a journal]", Energy & Environment: “We climate skeptics have to look for little journals like mine to even get published,” explains Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, the journal’s editor.
 
*Paul D. Thacker, "[http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2005/aug/policy/pt_skeptics.html  Skeptics get a journal]", Energy & Environment: “We climate skeptics have to look for little journals like mine to even get published,” explains Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, the journal’s editor.
 +
<references/>

Revision as of 21:02, 12 July 2010

Dr Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen claims[1] to be "an ‘expert’ on the science and politics of global warming since the late 1980s". This is contrasted by her skeptical contribution to the BBC's report[2] on scientific expertise in climate science by Anderegg & Prall et al where she opines "Who judges expertise and prominence? It looks to me that the authors belong to an IPCC supporting group that must count as believers and belong to the beneficiaries of the man-made warming scare."

"Many of the motives of supporters of 'green' solutions and ideas are suspect and the political ignorance or naivetey of environmentalists are a concern to me" [3]

References

  1. "[1]"
  2. "[2]"