Dave Obey
David Ross Obey, a Democrat, is a former U.S. Representative for the 7th Congressional District of Wisconsin, having served 1969 to 2011.[1]
Contents
Record and controversies
Obey is considered liberal in many respects, but not all. The National Rifle Association gives Obey high marks, and Obey did not support the Brady bill. [1] In addition, his record on abortion is mixed. Obey identifies himself as a Catholic, and was a signer of the Democrats Catholic Statement of Principles, which recognizes the "undesirability of abortion." [2] Obey does, however, follow many traditional Democratic issue positions, supporting labor unions, consumer rights groups, environmental groups and traditional civil rights groups.
Iraq War
Obey voted against the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 that started the Iraq War.[2]
Following President Bush's 2007 veto of the initial supplemental bill for funding the war in Iraq, Rep. Obey endorsed a measure (H.R.2206) which would provide $42.8 billion for the Iraq War without any withdrawal timetables or domestic funding. The funding would provide “immediate funding needs” to the U.S. military, including defense-wide healthcare needs, research and development. The bill would keep operations in Iraq going through July. Congress would then decide shortly before its August recess whether to release an additional $52.8 billion of war spending to last through September. The bill also contained most of the additional domestic funding from H.R.1591, including child health spending for state programs, Katrina disaster relief, flu fighting, and a minimum wage increase accompanied by small business tax relief.
- Main article: U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (H.R.2206)
- Main article: Congressional actions to end the Iraq War in the 110th Congress
Threat to hold up war funding
On October 2, 2007 Chairman David Obey said that he would hold $190 billion in Iraq War funding hostage until President Bush acceded to demands for an exit strategy and proposed a $150 billion war surtax. The tax plan was stopped within hours by Democratic leaders including Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) but the proposal to delay the war funding until 2008 was being seriously considered by Democratic leaders in Congress.
“The president isn’t going to get a supplemental this year,” said Obey. “The president soon or later is going to need that supplemental,” he said, adding that Bush would have to change course before Obey would let it move out of the House Appropriations Committee. Obey put two other conditions on moving the war bill in addition to a January 2009 goal for ending combat operations: a plan to make sure that soldiers get adequate time off between deployments and demonstration that the administration would engage in a broad diplomatic offensive involving other Middle East countries. Obey later said that he was flexible on the particulars. “We want any kind of movement at this point from existing policy,” he said. [3]
The proposed war surtax on income would have ranged from 2 to 15 percent of every American’s tax bill, raising about $150 billion a year to pay for the war. “If you don’t like the cost shut down the war,” said Obey. He added that “We need to stop pretending that this war doesn’t cost anything. House Majority leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said he did not want a supplemental to be a “blank check” but said that Obey’s plans were not yet those of the party. “We’re going to discuss Mr. Obey’s proposal. … There’s been no decision on that,” said Hoyer. [4]
Environmental record
For more information on environmental legislation, see the Energy and Environment Policy Portal
Budget
In December 2006, it became clear that the newly-elected Democratic-controlled Congress would need to address FY 2007 budgets in the first few weeks of the 110th Congress. Rep. Obey and Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.), incoming chairs of the House and Senate appropriations committees, said that Democrats would place a moratorium on earmarks “until a reformed process is put in place.” Obey stated, “Republicans have spent years handing out billions upon billions of dollars in tax cuts to millionaires while shortchanging our national priorities...It is going to take us years to get back on track.” Specifically, this would entail passing a continuing resolution without any earmarks to continue funding the federal government through the remainder of FY 2007 (through Sept. 30). President Bush called the moratorium “a good start” towards achieving fiscal discipline in Congress.
On January 31, 2007, the House passed a $463 billion continuing resolution to keep the federal government operating for the remainder of FY 2007 at FY 2006 spending levels (with some exceptions). It was approved by a 286-140 vote. House Appropriations Committee Chair Obey admitted the resolution had problems, stating “I don't expect people to love this proposal, I don't love this proposal, and we probably have made some wrong choices...At least we have made them in order to bring last year's issues to a conclusion so we can turn the page and deal with next year's priorities.” The White House indicated that President Bush would sign the measure.
- Main article: Continuing resolution of 2007
In June 2007, House Republicans successfully stalled passage of the FY2008 appropriations bills over the issue of earmark disclosure. By June 14, however, a final deal had been forged by Appropriations Committee Chairman Obey, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), and Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio). The agreement still allowed the Homeland Security and Military Construction bills, which typically include few earmarks, to move to conference committee without earmarks, where they would then be added. The remaining 10 appropriations bills, however, would list their earmarks up front, and any earmarks later added in conference would be allowed to come up on the House floor upon final consideration.
When Republicans criticized the House version of the bill for cuts to the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) program in the House-passed resolution, Obey stated that the $3 billion excluded from the bill for BRAC would be added later in the year to an Iraq War spending bill.
Bio
Background
Obey (pronounced Obie) was born October 3, 1938 in Okmulgee, Oklahoma and grew up in Wausau, Wisconsin. He attended the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Congressional career
He became a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly in 1963, and served there until 1969, when he was elected to the House to replace Melvin R. Laird, who was appointed Secretary of Defense under President Richard Nixon. Obey, only thirty years old at the time of his election, became the youngest member of Congress upon taking his seat. He is now the third-longest serving Democrat in the House, after John Dingell and John Conyers.
In Congress, Obey chaired the commission to write the House's Code of Ethics. Among the reforms he instituted was one requiring members of the House to disclose their personal financial dealings so that the public is made aware of any potential conflicts of interests.
2006 congressional elections
Obey defeated Republican Nick Reid to retain his seat.
2010 congressional elections
In 2010, Obey retired. The House seat was won by Republican Sean Duffy.[1]
Money in politics
This section contains links to – and feeds from – money in politics databases. <crpcontribdata>cid=N00004394&cycle=2006</crpcontribdata>
| Links to more campaign contribution information for Dave Obey from the Center for Responsive Politics' OpenSecrets.org site. |
||
|---|---|---|
| Fundraising profile: | 2006 election cycle | Career totals |
| Top contributors by organization/corporation: | 2006 election cycle | Career totals |
| Top contributors by industry: | 2006 election cycle | Career totals |
- Revolving door profile for Dave Obey from the Center for Responsive Politics' OpenSecrets.org website.
- 2006 privately funded travel profile for Dave Obey from the Center for Responsive Politics' OpenSecrets.org website.
- Personal finance profile for Dave Obey from the Center for Responsive Politics' OpenSecrets.org website.
Committees and affiliations
Committees
- House Committee on Appropriations -Chair
- Subcommittee on Agriculture -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice and Science -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Defense -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Energy and Water -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Financial Services -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Homeland Security -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Interior and Environment -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Legislative Branch -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans’ Affairs -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development -Ex Officio
- Subcommittee on Select Intelligence Oversight Panel -Ex Officio
Committee assignments in the 109th Congress (2005-2006)
- House Committee on Appropriations - Ranking Minority Member
- Subcommittee on Labor Health and Human Services Education and Related Agencies - Ranking Minority Member
Coalitions and caucuses
- Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
- Democratic Steering Committee
- Executive Committee, Democratic Study Group
- Policy Committee
- Steering Committee
Wikipedia also has an article on Dave Obey. This article may use content from the Wikipedia article under the terms of the GFDL.
Articles and resources
Related SourceWatch articlces
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Dave Obey profile, The Washington Post, accessed January 2011.
- ↑ Roll call vote, Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002.
- ↑ Steven T. Dennis, "Obey Fires Up Debate on Iraq," Roll Call, October 3, 2007.
- ↑ Steven T. Dennis, "Obey Fires Up Debate on Iraq," Roll Call, October 3, 2007.
Resources
Local blogs and discussion sites
Articles
- Larry Margasak, "Four Democrats aim to Clean up House," Associated Press, December 6, 2005.
- Walter Pincus, "Democrats Who Opposed War Move Into Key Positions. New Committee Chairmen Had Warned of Postwar Disorder," Washington Post, December 4, 2006.
