Changes

Hi- I saw yr message, and havent yet seen what AI di , but would answer you that as Sourcewatch appears to relate to publications and sources, that Wikipedia, '''and the vatican''', both amount to sources that are watchable. please reply, and give proper due reason why this analysis of both these sources is not apposite. Moreover the material has disappeared. If it remains in History, I shall copy it to harddisk. I would have to ask if this is in fact a form of censorship by you, resulting from institutional fear? Please re-consider your actions, as I am sure you well know that WP is effectievly censored, and that this material is a real and relevant subject. May I ask you to treat my contributions with the seriousness that the subject deserves, and to address me fully on this matter? Thanks.[[User:EffK|EffK]] 05:59, 31 May 2007 (EDT)