Talk:Libero!

Hi L Durnan -- I'm afraid "suspected" is a bit too speculative (it begs the q of who suspects and why). Maybe there is more to come on this page that means the link can be tightened up. If not then I think we are better off deleting the ref to the LN-Libero link until there is something definite to say about it. What you think? -- --Bob Burton 05:08, 6 Sep 2004 (EDT)

I originally had a look at Libero as they were cited on the LM group profile on GMWatch.org. You were right to pull me up on the LM link before as it was weak to say the least. Its been significantly hardened now up with some research I've done this morning. Great to see how SourceWatch is kept rigorous by your watchful eye! all the best, Laurence

Laurence -- well done, much tighter.--Bob Burton 22:41, 6 Sep 2004 (EDT)