Editorials supporting Bush or Kerry
Playing with the format...
Newspaper editorials supporting George W. Bush or John F. Kerry in the U.S. presidential election, 2004
State-by-state newspaper endorsements
Alabama
- Mobile Register (B): 100,244
|
|
- The Anniston Star (Mason City): (G): 26,527
|
Arizona
- Arizona Daily Star (Tucson) (G): 109,592
|
|
- Arizona Republic (Phoenix) (B): 466,926
|
Arkansas
|
|
- Southwest Times Record (Fort Smith) (B): 37,636
|
California
- San Francisco Chronicle (G): 501,135
- Sacramento Bee (G): 303,841
- San Jose Mercury News (G): 279,539
- Fresno Bee (G): 166,531
- The Press Democrat (Santa Rosa) (G): 89,384
- The Modesto Bee (G): 87,366
- Merced Sun-Star: 17,247
|
|
- San Diego Union-Tribune (B): 361,317
- The Press-Enterprise (Riverside): 191,802
- The Record (Stockton) (B): 62,139
- The Reporter (Vacaville) (B): 18,227
|
Florida
- St. Petersburg Times (G): 358,502
- Miami Herald (G): 325,032
- Sun-Sentinel (Ft. Lauderdale) (G): 268,927
- Orlando Sentinel (B)
- Palm Beach Post (G): 181,727
- Daytona Beach News-Journal (G): 112,945
- Florida Today (Melbourne) (G): 90,877
- Bradenton Herald (B): 52,163
|
|
|
Georgia
- The Atlanta Journal-Constitution: 418,323
|
|
- Savannah Morning News (B): 57,288
|
Hawaii
- Honolulu Advertiser (G): 145,943
|
|
|
Illinois
- Daily Herald (Arlington Heights) (B): 150,794
|
|
- Chicago Tribune (B): 578,843
- The Pantagraph (Bloomington) (B): 47,931
- The News-Gazette (Champaign-Urbana): 39,190
|
Indiana
|
|
- Indianapolis Star (B): 253,778
|
Iowa
- The Hawk Eye (Burlington) (G): 19,000
|
|
- Globe-Gazette (Mason City): 18,947
|
No endorsement
Tampa Tribune: But we are unable to endorse President Bush for re- election because of his mishandling of the war in Iraq, his record deficit spending, his assault on open government and his failed promise to be a "uniter not a divider" within the United States and the world. Neither can we endorse Sen. Kerry, whose undistinguished Senate record stands at odds with our conservative principles and whose positions on the Iraq war - the central issue in this campaign - have been difficult to distinguish or differentiate.
|
|