Difference between revisions of "Oak Grove Plant"

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(SW: SW: category change)
(Update plant data, old outdated layout, added information and update nameplate cap all from EIA database. improved GPS location added)
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{#badges: CoalSwarm}}
+
{{#badges: CoalSwarm}}  
−
[[Luminant]] (formerly TXU) proposed a 1720 MW supercritical, lignite-coal-burning plant (technically, two plants) in Franklin, TX.<ref>[http://www.stopthecoalplant.org/downloads/power_plants_emissions_data.pdf Emissions from Recently Permitted and Proposed Coal Burning Power Plants], Stop the Coal Plant website, August 7, 2007.</ref><ref>[http://ff.org/centers/csspp/library/co2weekly/20051229_news/20051229_18.html Proposed Coal Plant Finds Favor, Criticism], ''Bryan-College Station Eagle'', December 26, 2005.</ref> Engineering and construction have been contracted to Fluor. In Feb. 2007, two private equity firms bought out TXU and promised to drop eight of eleven proposed coal plants in Texas;<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/business/26coal.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin A Buyout Deal That Has Many Shades of Green], ''New York Times'', February 26, 2007.</ref> the Oak Grove plant is one of three coal plants still being pursued by the company.
+
'''Oak Grove Plant''' is a 1,795.4-megwatt (MW) Lignite coal-fired power station owned and operated by the [[Luminant]] near Franklin, Texas.
  
−
In Aug. 2006, state administrative judges recommended denial of Oak Grove's permit based on doubts about the adequacy of pollution controls,<ref>[http://www.seedcoalition.org/news_wacotribune_082406.html TXU's Oak Grove Plant Hits Stump in Permitting Process], ''Waco Tribune-Herald'', August 24, 2006.</ref> but the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (whose three-member decision-making body was appointed solely by Gov. Perry, a long-time TXU campaign-cash beneficiary) approved the plants on June 13, 2007.<ref>[http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A492085 Power Plant Pollution Battle Still On], ''Austin Chronicle'', June 15, 2007.</ref> Fluor was awarded notice to proceed with construction on June 21.<ref>[http://www.allbusiness.com/services/business-services/4523094-1.html Fluor Awarded Full Notice to Proceed for TXU's Oak Grove Project], Fluor Corporation press release, June 21, 2007.</ref>
+
==Location==
−
 
+
{{#display_map:
−
==Project Details==
+
31.182136,-96.487621
−
'''Sponsor:''' Luminant (formerly TXU)<br>
+
|width=600
−
'''Location:''' Franklin, TX<br>
+
|height=500
−
'''Capacity:''' 1720 MW<br>
+
|type=satellite
−
'''Type:''' Supercritical<br>
+
|zoom=16
−
'''Projected in service:''' 2009/10<br>
+
}}
−
'''Status:''' Construction<br>
 
  
−
==Financing==
+
==Plant Data==
−
*[[Citigroup]]
+
*'''Owner''': [[Luminant]]
−
*[[Credit Suisse]]
+
*'''Parent Company''': [[Vistra Energy]]
−
*[[Goldman Sachs]]
+
*'''Plant Nameplate Capacity''': 1,795.4 MW (Megawatts)
−
*[[JP Morgan Chase]]
+
*'''Units and In-Service Dates''': Unit 1: 916.8 MW (2010), Unit 2: 878.6 MW (2011)
−
*[[Merrill Lynch]]
+
*'''Location''': 8127 Oak Grove Road; Franklin, TX 77856
−
*[[Morgan Stanley]]
+
*'''GPS Coordinates''': 31.182136,-96.487621
 +
*'''Technology:''' Supercritical
 +
*'''Coal type:''' Lignite
 +
*'''Coal Consumption:'''
 +
*'''Coal Source''': [[Kosse Strip Mine]]
 +
*'''Number of Employees''':
 +
*'''Unit Retirements:'''
  
 
==Citizen Groups==
 
==Citizen Groups==
Line 25: Line 30:
 
*[http://www.texas.sierraclub.org/air.asp Texas Sierra Club], Neil Carman, neil_carman [at] greenbuilder.com
 
*[http://www.texas.sierraclub.org/air.asp Texas Sierra Club], Neil Carman, neil_carman [at] greenbuilder.com
 
*[http://www.citizen.org/texas/Dereg/coalplants/ Texas Public Citizen], jcarraway [at] citizen.org
 
*[http://www.citizen.org/texas/Dereg/coalplants/ Texas Public Citizen], jcarraway [at] citizen.org
 +
 +
==Summary==
 +
[[Luminant]] (formerly TXU) proposed a 1740 MW supercritical, lignite-coal-burning plant (technically, two plants) in Franklin, TX.<ref>[http://www.stopthecoalplant.org/downloads/power_plants_emissions_data.pdf Emissions from Recently Permitted and Proposed Coal Burning Power Plants], Stop the Coal Plant website, August 7, 2007.</ref><ref>[http://ff.org/centers/csspp/library/co2weekly/20051229_news/20051229_18.html Proposed Coal Plant Finds Favor, Criticism], ''Bryan-College Station Eagle'', December 26, 2005.</ref>
 +
 +
Engineering and construction were contracted to Fluor. In Feb. 2007, two private equity firms bought out TXU and promised to drop eight of eleven proposed coal plants in Texas;<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/business/26coal.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin A Buyout Deal That Has Many Shades of Green], ''New York Times'', February 26, 2007.</ref> the Oak Grove plant is one of three coal plants still being pursued by the company.
 +
 +
==Background==
 +
 +
In Aug. 2006, state administrative judges recommended denial of Oak Grove's permit based on doubts about the adequacy of pollution controls,<ref>[http://www.seedcoalition.org/news_wacotribune_082406.html TXU's Oak Grove Plant Hits Stump in Permitting Process], ''Waco Tribune-Herald'', August 24, 2006.</ref> but the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (whose three-member decision-making body was appointed solely by Gov. Perry, a long-time TXU campaign-cash beneficiary) approved the plants on June 13, 2007.<ref>[http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A492085 Power Plant Pollution Battle Still On], ''Austin Chronicle'', June 15, 2007.</ref> Fluor was awarded notice to proceed with construction on June 21.<ref>[http://www.allbusiness.com/services/business-services/4523094-1.html Fluor Awarded Full Notice to Proceed for TXU's Oak Grove Project], Fluor Corporation press release, June 21, 2007.</ref>
 +
 +
On July 21, 2008, the Fifth District Court of Appeals ruled to uphold the District Court's decision denying CleanCOALition and Robertson County: Our Lands, Our Lives' air permit challenge.  The environmental groups argued that the permit violated the Clean Air Act (CAA) because it failed to adequately include a Best Available Control Technology (BACT) analysis.  The final air permit for the plant is now being appealed.<ref>[http://www.sierraclub.org/environmentallaw/coal/plantlist.asp "Stopping the Coal Rush"], Sierra Club, accessed January 2008. (This is a Sierra Club list of new coal plant proposals.)</ref>
 +
 +
As of October 2009, Oak Grove unit 1 was scheduled for completion by the end of the year, and unit 2 was expected to be complete in mid-2010.<ref>[http://www.snl.com/Interactivex/article.aspx?id=10132262&KPLT=2 "Coal plant construction continues in earnest at some sites,"] SNL Interactive, October 5, 2009. (Subscription required.)</ref>
 +
 +
On December 28, 2009, Luminant announced that it had put the first of the two new units online.<ref>[http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/80226967.html "Work Finished On New Coal-Fired Central Texas Power Plant Unit,"] KWTX, December 28, 2009.</ref> As of June, 2010, both units were operational.<ref>[http://www.sierraclub.org/environmentallaw/coal/plantlist.asp "Stopping the Coal Rush"], Sierra Club, accessed January 2011. (This is a Sierra Club list of new coal plant proposals.)</ref> According to the US EIA, the plants officially began operating in 2010-2011.<ref>[https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia860/ Form EIA-860 Data - Schedule 3, Generator Data,] US EIA, 2014</ref>
 +
 +
==Employment==
 +
A 2011 Ochs Center for Metropolitan Studies report, [http://www.afractionofthejobs.com/ "A Fraction of the Jobs"] found that coal-fired power plants underestimate jobs by more than half. The analysis looked at the six largest new coal-fired power plants to come online between 2005 and 2009, including Oak Grove Plant, and combed through each project’s initial proposals and job projection data, including public statements, published documents and other material. They then compared hat data to actual employment — before, during and after construction — in the areas where the projects were built, relying chiefly on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.<ref name=tz>Tom Zeller, [http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/coal-jobs-and-americas-energy-future/?smid=tw-nytimesgreen&seid=auto "Coal, Jobs and America’s Energy Future"] NY Times, March 31, 2011.</ref>
 +
 +
They found that only a little over half - or 56 percent - of every 1,000 jobs projected, appeared to be actually created as a result of the coal plants’ coming online. In four of the six counties, the projects delivered on just over a quarter of the jobs projected. Only one county, the Walter Scott unit number 4 project in Pottawattamie County, Iowa, saw an increase in construction employment that was roughly commensurate with the numbers predicted before the project there got under way.<ref name=tz/>
 +
 +
===Construction Employment Change in Counties with New Coal Plants===
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
! Plant !! width="100" | County !! width="100" | Total Projected Employment !! width="100" | Actual County Construction Employment Change (Peak) !! width="100" | Actual Change as % of Projection
 +
|-
 +
! align="center" | [[Sandow Unit 5]]
 +
| align="right" | Milam || align="right" | 1,370 || align="right" | 463 || align="right" | 33.7%
 +
|-
 +
! align="center" | [[Nebraska City Station Unit 2]]
 +
| align="right" | Otoe || align="right" | N/A || align="right" | -73 || align="right" | N/A
 +
|-
 +
! align="center" | [[Weston Unit 4]]
 +
| align="right" | Marathon || align="right" | 1,200 || align="right" | 429 || align="right" | 35.7%
 +
|-
 +
! align="center" | [[Council Bluffs Energy Center Unit 4]]
 +
| align="right" | Pottawattamie || align="right" | 1,000 || align="right" | 2,407 || align="right" | 240.7%
 +
|-
 +
! align="center" | [[Cross Generating Station Unit 4|Cross 3 & 4]]
 +
| align="right" | Berkeley || align="right" | 1,400 || align="right" | 509 || align="right" | 36.3%
 +
|-
 +
! align="center" | [[Oak Grove Plant|Oak Grove Units 1 & 2]]
 +
| align="right" | Robertson || align="right" | 2,400 || align="right" | 329 || align="right" | 13.7%
 +
|}
  
 
==Resources==
 
==Resources==
Line 31: Line 79:
  
 
===Related SourceWatch Articles===
 
===Related SourceWatch Articles===
 +
*[[Coal plant litigation]]
 +
*[[Texas and coal]]
 +
*[[United States and coal]]
 +
*[[Carbon Capture and Storage]]
 +
*[[Existing U.S. Coal Plants]]
 +
*[[:category:Proposed coal plants in the United States|US proposed coal plants (both active and cancelled)]]
 +
*[[Coal plants cancelled in 2007]]
 +
*[[Coal plants cancelled in 2008]]
 +
*[[State-by-State Guide to Information on Coal in the United States|State-by-state guide to information on coal in the United States]] '''(or click on the map)'''
 +
{{USA_imagemap_state_names_coal}}
  
 
=== External links ===
 
=== External links ===
Line 38: Line 96:
  
 
[[Category: Proposed coal plants in Texas]][[Category: Energy]]
 
[[Category: Proposed coal plants in Texas]][[Category: Energy]]
 +
[[Category:Proposed coal plants in the United States]]
 +
[[Category: Existing coal plants in the United States]]

Latest revision as of 01:27, 8 July 2019

{{#badges: CoalSwarm}} Oak Grove Plant is a 1,795.4-megwatt (MW) Lignite coal-fired power station owned and operated by the Luminant near Franklin, Texas.

Location

Plant Data

  • Owner: Luminant
  • Parent Company: Vistra Energy
  • Plant Nameplate Capacity: 1,795.4 MW (Megawatts)
  • Units and In-Service Dates: Unit 1: 916.8 MW (2010), Unit 2: 878.6 MW (2011)
  • Location: 8127 Oak Grove Road; Franklin, TX 77856
  • GPS Coordinates: 31.182136,-96.487621
  • Technology: Supercritical
  • Coal type: Lignite
  • Coal Consumption:
  • Coal Source: Kosse Strip Mine
  • Number of Employees:
  • Unit Retirements:

Citizen Groups

Summary

Luminant (formerly TXU) proposed a 1740 MW supercritical, lignite-coal-burning plant (technically, two plants) in Franklin, TX.[1][2]

Engineering and construction were contracted to Fluor. In Feb. 2007, two private equity firms bought out TXU and promised to drop eight of eleven proposed coal plants in Texas;[3] the Oak Grove plant is one of three coal plants still being pursued by the company.

Background

In Aug. 2006, state administrative judges recommended denial of Oak Grove's permit based on doubts about the adequacy of pollution controls,[4] but the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (whose three-member decision-making body was appointed solely by Gov. Perry, a long-time TXU campaign-cash beneficiary) approved the plants on June 13, 2007.[5] Fluor was awarded notice to proceed with construction on June 21.[6]

On July 21, 2008, the Fifth District Court of Appeals ruled to uphold the District Court's decision denying CleanCOALition and Robertson County: Our Lands, Our Lives' air permit challenge. The environmental groups argued that the permit violated the Clean Air Act (CAA) because it failed to adequately include a Best Available Control Technology (BACT) analysis. The final air permit for the plant is now being appealed.[7]

As of October 2009, Oak Grove unit 1 was scheduled for completion by the end of the year, and unit 2 was expected to be complete in mid-2010.[8]

On December 28, 2009, Luminant announced that it had put the first of the two new units online.[9] As of June, 2010, both units were operational.[10] According to the US EIA, the plants officially began operating in 2010-2011.[11]

Employment

A 2011 Ochs Center for Metropolitan Studies report, "A Fraction of the Jobs" found that coal-fired power plants underestimate jobs by more than half. The analysis looked at the six largest new coal-fired power plants to come online between 2005 and 2009, including Oak Grove Plant, and combed through each project’s initial proposals and job projection data, including public statements, published documents and other material. They then compared hat data to actual employment — before, during and after construction — in the areas where the projects were built, relying chiefly on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.[12]

They found that only a little over half - or 56 percent - of every 1,000 jobs projected, appeared to be actually created as a result of the coal plants’ coming online. In four of the six counties, the projects delivered on just over a quarter of the jobs projected. Only one county, the Walter Scott unit number 4 project in Pottawattamie County, Iowa, saw an increase in construction employment that was roughly commensurate with the numbers predicted before the project there got under way.[12]

Construction Employment Change in Counties with New Coal Plants

Plant County Total Projected Employment Actual County Construction Employment Change (Peak) Actual Change as % of Projection
Sandow Unit 5 Milam 1,370 463 33.7%
Nebraska City Station Unit 2 Otoe N/A -73 N/A
Weston Unit 4 Marathon 1,200 429 35.7%
Council Bluffs Energy Center Unit 4 Pottawattamie 1,000 2,407 240.7%
Cross 3 & 4 Berkeley 1,400 509 36.3%
Oak Grove Units 1 & 2 Robertson 2,400 329 13.7%

Resources

References

  1. ↑ Emissions from Recently Permitted and Proposed Coal Burning Power Plants, Stop the Coal Plant website, August 7, 2007.
  2. ↑ Proposed Coal Plant Finds Favor, Criticism, Bryan-College Station Eagle, December 26, 2005.
  3. ↑ A Buyout Deal That Has Many Shades of Green, New York Times, February 26, 2007.
  4. ↑ TXU's Oak Grove Plant Hits Stump in Permitting Process, Waco Tribune-Herald, August 24, 2006.
  5. ↑ Power Plant Pollution Battle Still On, Austin Chronicle, June 15, 2007.
  6. ↑ Fluor Awarded Full Notice to Proceed for TXU's Oak Grove Project, Fluor Corporation press release, June 21, 2007.
  7. ↑ "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed January 2008. (This is a Sierra Club list of new coal plant proposals.)
  8. ↑ "Coal plant construction continues in earnest at some sites," SNL Interactive, October 5, 2009. (Subscription required.)
  9. ↑ "Work Finished On New Coal-Fired Central Texas Power Plant Unit," KWTX, December 28, 2009.
  10. ↑ "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed January 2011. (This is a Sierra Club list of new coal plant proposals.)
  11. ↑ Form EIA-860 Data - Schedule 3, Generator Data, US EIA, 2014
  12. ↑ Jump up to: 12.0 12.1 Tom Zeller, "Coal, Jobs and America’s Energy Future" NY Times, March 31, 2011.

Related SourceWatch Articles

Alabama and coalAlaska and coalArizona and coalArkansas and coalCalifornia and coalColorado and coalConnecticut and coalDelaware and coalFlorida and coalGeorgia and coalHawaii and coalIdaho and coalIllinois and coalIndiana and coalIowa and coalKansas and coalKentucky and coalLouisiana and coalMaine and coalMaryland and coalMassachusetts and coalMichigan and coalMinnesota and coalMississippi and coalMissouri and coalMontana and coalNebraska and coalNevada and coalNew Hampshire and coalNew Jersey and coalNew Mexico and coalNew York and coalNorth Carolina and coalNorth Dakota and coalOhio and coalOklahoma and coalOregon and coalPennsylvania and coalRhode Island and coalSouth Carolina and coalSouth Dakota and coalTennessee and coalTexas and coalUtah and coalVermont and coalVirginia and coalWashington State and coalWest Virginia and coalWisconsin and coalWyoming and coalDelaware and coalMaryland and coalNew Hampshire and coalNew Jersey and coalMassachusetts and coalConnecticut and coalWest Virginia and coalVermont and coalRhode Island and coalMap of USA with state names.png
About this image

External links

Retrieved from "https://dev.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oak_Grove_Plant&oldid=751189"