Weston Unit 4
{{#badges: CoalSwarm}} This project is being built by Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, south of Wausau, WI. Dairyland Power has a 150 MW share of this plant. Construction began in Oct. 2004, and WPS expects the plant to be online by June 2008.[1] Currently, the plant is in the two month initial start-up phase. The plant produced electricity on March 20, 2008. [2] The Sierra Club has contested the project’s air permits; the administrative judge assigned to the case agreed that more stringent pollution controls were legally required, but refused to halt construction of the plant. The Sierra Club has appealed the case to the Wisconsin state court.[3]
On February 12, 2009, the Court affirmed the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources's approval of the air permit. According to the Sierra Club, they are considering appealing the case in the Wisconsin Court of Appeals.[4]
Contents
Project Details
Sponsor: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
Location: Wausau, Marathon County, WI
Capacity: 500 MW
Type: Pulverized coal
Projected in service: 2008
Status: Construction
Financing
Citizen Groups
- Wisconsin Sierra Club, Shahla Werner, join.muir.chapter [at] sierraclub.org
- Clean Wisconsin, Mark Redsten
Employment
A 2011 Ochs Center for Metropolitan Studies report, "A Fraction of the Jobs" found that coal-fired power plants underestimate jobs by more than half. The analysis looked at the six largest new coal-fired power plants to come online between 2005 and 2009, including Weston Unit 4, and combed through each project’s initial proposals and job projection data, including public statements, published documents and other material. They then compared hat data to actual employment — before, during and after construction — in the areas where the projects were built, relying chiefly on the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.[5]
They found that only a little over half - or 56 percent - of every 1,000 jobs projected, appeared to be actually created as a result of the coal plants’ coming online. In four of the six counties, the projects delivered on just over a quarter of the jobs projected. Only one county, the Walter Scott unit number 4 project in Pottawattamie County, Iowa, saw an increase in construction employment that was roughly commensurate with the numbers predicted before the project there got under way.[5]
Construction Employment Change in Counties with New Coal Plants
| Plant | County | Total Projected Employment | Actual County Construction Employment Change (Peak) | Actual Change as % of Projection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandow Unit 5 | Milam | 1,370 | 463 | 33.7% |
| Nebraska City Station Unit 2 | Otoe | N/A | -73 | N/A |
| Weston Unit 4 | Marathon | 1,200 | 429 | 35.7% |
| Council Bluffs Energy Center Unit 4 | Pottawattamie | 1,000 | 2,407 | 240.7% |
| Cross 3 & 4 | Berkeley | 1,400 | 509 | 36.3% |
| Oak Grove Units 1 & 2 | Robertson | 2,400 | 329 | 13.7% |
Resources
References
- ↑ Wisconsin Public Service Corporation website, accessed January 2008.
- ↑ [1], accessed April 2008.
- ↑ "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed January 2008. (This is a Sierra Club list of new coal plant proposals.)
- ↑ "Stopping the Coal Rush", Sierra Club, accessed May 2009. (This is a Sierra Club list of new coal plant proposals.)
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Tom Zeller, "Coal, Jobs and America’s Energy Future" NY Times, March 31, 2011.
Related SourceWatch Articles
- Wisconsin and coal
- Coal plant litigation
- United States and coal
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Existing U.S. Coal Plants
- US proposed coal plants (both active and cancelled)
- Coal plants cancelled in 2007
- Coal plants cancelled in 2008
- State-by-state guide to information on coal in the United States (or click on the map)
<us_map redirect="{state} and coal"></us_map>
External links
- "Tracking New Coal-Fired Power Plants", National Energy Technology Lab, May 2007, page 22. (PDF)
- Wisconsin Public Service Corporation website
