Difference between revisions of "Nuclear Power and Global Warming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Add climate change badge) |
(Removal of Nuclear spin badge tags, and subsequent replacement with Nuclear PR Category tags.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{#badges: Climate change | + | {{#badges: Climate change}} |
In a bid to sell the story of a 'nuclear renaissance', the nuclear power industry is promoting the claim that as its greenhouse gas emissions are lower than coal-fired thermal plants, that is it the only large scale 'solution' to [[global warming]]. | In a bid to sell the story of a 'nuclear renaissance', the nuclear power industry is promoting the claim that as its greenhouse gas emissions are lower than coal-fired thermal plants, that is it the only large scale 'solution' to [[global warming]]. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[Category:Nuclear power]] | [[Category:Nuclear power]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Nuclear PR]] | ||
[[Category:Environment]] | [[Category:Environment]] | ||
[[Category:Climate change]] | [[Category:Climate change]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:45, 26 June 2017
{{#badges: Climate change}} In a bid to sell the story of a 'nuclear renaissance', the nuclear power industry is promoting the claim that as its greenhouse gas emissions are lower than coal-fired thermal plants, that is it the only large scale 'solution' to global warming.
External links
- Mark Clayton, "How green is nuclear power?: Some call it a carbon-free alternative to fossil fuels, but others point to significant environmental costs", Christian Science Monitor, March 7, 2007.
- Richard Simon, Nuclear power enters global warming debate; Legislation to cut greenhouse gas emissions creates new alliances and opens old wounds on Capitol Hill, Los Angeles Times, April 9, 2007.
| This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it. |
