Business Council on Indoor Air
This stub is a work-in-progress by the ScienceCorruption.com journalists's group. We are indexing the millions of documents stored at the San Francisco Uni's Legacy Tobacco Archive [1] With some entries you'll need to go to this site and type into the Search panel a (multi-digit) Bates number. You can search on names for other documents also. Send any corrections or additions to editor@sciencecorruption.com |
This article is part of the Tobacco portal on Sourcewatch funded from 2006 - 2009 by the American Legacy Foundation. |
The Business Council on Indoor Air (BCIA) was a tobacco and chemical industry front organisation run by Paul A Cammer (aka Camer). It should not be confused with BOMA which is the [[Building Operators and Managers Association[[, but the two certainly had some affinities (the tobacco industry funded BOMA's magazine and some conferences).
The BCIA also published a magazine "Indoor Air Bulletin" which was funded by tobacco and chemical companies, and it had Gray Robertson of Healthy Buildings International as one of its directors -- a sure sign that it was being run by Philip Morris or the Tobacco Institute. [2] The magazine was established in late 1988.
BCIA Staff
The BCIA had a staff of six:
- Paul A Cammer, President
- M. Denny and S Holm (probably secretaries)
- Stephen P Risotto, Director of Legislation Affairs
- Matrice Mangum-Denny, (unknown)
- Nancy G Doerrer, Director of Scientific Affairs
Documents & Timeline
1988 Sep /E The BCIA was established by Paul Oreffice of Dow Chemicals for the Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA) and the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association (SOCMA). Paul A Cammer was hired to run the organisation. He had previously run the PR firm Cammer & Associates, 1225 19th Street, Washington DC.
1989 Aug Paul Cammer has been planting a tobacco industry article in Chemical Week the journal of the CMA. [3]
1989 Sep The report of John Lyons from the Tobacco Institute
Nearly a year ago, we helped establish and began working with a new trade group -- the Business Council on Indoor Air. BCIA represents several major chemical manufacturers and firms specializing in indoor air analysis. The chemical companies share our concerns about EPA being given jurisdiction to research and pass judgment on individual components of indoor air.
We are not members of BCIA -- the chemical companies said they would not participate if tobacco was involved -- but we are able to wield substantial influence over the direction of the group. We pay several of our indoor air consultants to be members of the organization, seats on the board of directors. In addition, we make public relations and legal and legislative counsel available to BCIA.
The executive director of BCIA (Paul Cammer) has been extremely helpful. He has provided timely intelligence and advice on developments at EPA. He has also appeared before the EPA Science Advisory Board to criticize in strong terms a report the agency produced on indoor air research needs that called for extensive pollutant-by-pollutant research.
Like AFGE (the union of American Federal Government Employees), BCIA testified last spring before Senator Lautenberg. BCIA opposed vesting EPA with sole authority over any federal indoor air program, urging Congress to create an interagency committee to oversee the issue. BCIA urged a building systems approach to the problem rather than a source-by-source witch hunt. BCIA also argued that, despite the claims of its author, the Mitchell bill would greatly expand EPA's regulatory authority. We were able to comment on BCIA's draft testimony.
BCIA is also appearing before Congressman Scheuer today. And again our views will be represented but without our fingerprints.[4]
1989 Sept An article by Cammer in theIndoor Air Bulletin included material on Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and asbestos, but exonerates tobacco. [5]
1993 Dec 28 Philip Morris report on ETS/Accommodation activities uses initials to identify internal staff (handlers) and external contractors (lobbyists).
- PM Staff • DL = David G Laufer • TW = Tina A Walls • RM = Roy Marsden • TB = Tom Borelli • DK = Denise F Keane (?)
- Lobbyists • TH = Tom Hockaday (APCO) • LS = Lee Stitzenberger (Dolphin) • RH = Richard Hines (Hines & Quinn)
Philip Morris is creating op-eds on IAQ and risk assessment, which will be distributed to the media (by Tom Hockaday at APCO) under the fake bylines of:
- IRP -- Institute for Regulatory Policy, a phantom scientific organisation - actually a lobby group - run by Thorne Auchter and Jim Tozzi of Multinational Business Services.
- TIEQ -- Total Indoor Environment Quality, an offshoot of the National Environmental Development Association (wider coalition) run for the tobacco industry by Matt Swetonic and other lobbyists from the PR company E Bruce Harrison,
- BCIA -- Business Council on Indoor Air, created and funded by the chemical industry via Paul Oreffice of Dow Chemicals and run by Paul Cammer, as a IAQ lobbyist for chemical companies (with Cammer working for tobacco on the side).
- NEMI -- National Energy Management Institute, a subsection of the AFL-CIO/union groups which was funded and directed by tobacco.
- HBI -- Healthy Buildings International, an air-testing and duct-cleaning company run by Gray Robertson, which worked for the Tobacco Institute, discounting the role cigarette smoke played in indoor air pollution.] [6]
1996 The testimony of Gray Robertson, of Healthy Buildings International (HBI) discussed the BCIA. He says that he was approached by Peter Sparber, the contract Issues Manager for the Tobacco Institute. (He misspells the name as 'Sparger')
"He told me that he was excited about this BCIA which I presume had been running for several years then ... and that they were very involved in studying the effects of different pollutants in the environment. And I thought it would be a good idea to meet them, because they are talking to some very large companies. I think some of the members of the BCIA were people like Union Carbide, Dow Chemicals, Owens Corning, possibly ICI, and there were a couple of (HVAC) filter manufacturers. I think Enviro Care was one of them.
He made a presentation to them and they asked if he would join the group (as a IAQ testing contractor)
[Slightly paraphrased:] Owens Corning were concerned about a witchhunt on fiberglass because they make fiberglass. Dow Chemicals might have been concerned about different volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the buildings ... (and others) were concerned about paints and adhesives ... etc. [He was asked to pay a membership fee of $15,000, which he didn't have] I spoke to Peter Sparber who suggested he talk to the tobacco industry and ask them to recompense me if I paid the $15,000.
Jeff Seckler (the later HBI whistleblower) was on their technical committee. [7]
Another testimony (refering to the original) carries this note:
"HBI took $15,000 from TI (to pay for membership in the Business Council on Indoor Air -'BCIA") in return for producing pro-tobacco articles, testimony and inspections . (Robertson TR 97-100)." [8]
Section missing here. Simmons material
POSSIBLY (CHECK) [9]
Note There are many Simmons affidavits and testimonies but none with this date
ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE INVESTIGATION STAFF REPORT [10]
Also see [1] [2] [3] [4]