Peter Martin

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This stub is a work-in-progress by the ScienceCorruption.com journalists's group. We are indexing the millions of documents stored at the San Francisco Uni's Legacy Tobacco Archive [1] With some entries you'll need to go to this site and type into the Search panel a (multi-digit) Bates number. You can search on names for other documents also.     Send any corrections or additions to editor@sciencecorruption.com

{{#badges: tobaccowiki}}


Peter Martin was an Associate Principal Scientist for Philip Morris Europe working out of the Swiss subsidiary called 'FTR' in Neuchatel. [1]

He worked on Research and Development for Philip Morris, for some time, but then like most of their scientists (there was little point in doing genuine research) he shifted over to become a professional disinformation specialist and to organising and running tobacco industry scams. He ran most of these out of Switzerland.

For instance: Professor Gabor Kendrey was a pathologist in Budapest, Hungary, who worked with Professor Bela J Szende of Semmelweiss Medical University as a science corrupter for the tobacco industry. They were initially handled by Peter Martin operating out of the Science & Technology (S&T) division of Philip Morris's Swiss subsidiary, known as FTR, but this operation was handed over to be run by Francis JC Roe and Peter N Lee (a statistician consultant) out of London. These two were also key members of the ARIA group.

Documents & Timeline

1975 He used the qualification of a PhD (Dr. Peter Martin) and he worked for Philip Morris Research Center at Box 26583, Richmond, Virginia 23261 in 1975. [Butler 2021648905-13, (P.O.)]


1993 Feb 25 Peter N Lee and Francis JC Roe have visited Professors Bela J Szende (Semmelweiss Medical University) and Gabor Kendrey in Budapest. They want to use Hungarian autopsy data from people who have died from lung cancer; they are looking for rates of false-positives and false-negatives in diagnosis. They also want to check for later changes in death certificates after microscopic analysis of lung tissue.

One "200 Person" study showed that every patient dying of lung-cancer except one had smoked, so they decided against publishing the material. They saw it as only useful to check the false-positive rates. The two Hungarians were to prepare papers and send them to Lee and Roe for comment. Lee would feed them details culled from the literature as to accuracy of diagnosis. A number of papers were commissioned from Szende and Kendrey (jointly). They would also give papers at conferences if expenses were covered.

Lee included costs:

  • £16,000 for his own/company time
£ 2,500 for Roe's consultancy services
£ 2,000 for expenses in Budapest
£ 2,500 for Szende and Kendrey for discussion time
£ 1,500 each for them for travel expenses
Estimated £16,750 to complete the project [2]

1993 May 22 Peter Martin at FTR in Switzerland (PM subsidiary) sends Charles Wall ('Chuck') his own bill for a meeting with Kendrey and Szende. Peter N Lee has taken them over and will handle their expenses. [3]


1994 Feb 23 Bela Szende met with Lee and Roe in London to discuss further papers.


1994 Jul 25 Szende and Kendrey have met again with Roe and Lee at Neuchatel, Switzerland, also with a group of disinformation executives from Philip Morris's S&T FTR (Anthony Andrade, Mitchell Ritter, Iancou A Marcovitch, Andre Badstuber, MKS & Ruth Dempster) They are to review the Hungarian Autopsy study. (Peter Martin is not recorded as being at this meeting)

  1. A paper had been sent to Human & Experimental Toxicology, but not yet published.
  2. Another paper on the accuracy of diagnosis was with: Acta. Path. Med. Imm. Scan" -- and this needs to be paid to be published as a supplement.

Philip Morris would back these proposals under the control of Roe and Lee (except for the 200 person study) [4]


<tdo>resource_id=1446 resource_code=martin_peter

search_term=Peter Martin</tdo>

  1. (PMI's Introduction to Privilege Log and Glossary of Names, Estate of Burl Butler v. PMI, et al, April 19, 1996)