Coal plants cancelled in 2009

{{#badges: CoalSwarm}}

Related resources

• "$45.3 Billion In U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants Cancelled In 2007," Resource Media fact sheet (1/8/08)
• Coal plants cancelled in 2007
• Coal plants cancelled in 2008
• What happened to the 151 proposed coal plants?
• US proposed coal plants - a list of all coal plant proposals by state
• Citizen groups working on coal issues - a list of grassroots groups actively working on coal plant proposals (250+ groups)

Background

Between 2000 and 2006, over 150 coal plant proposals were fielded by utilities in the United States. By the end of 2007, 10 of those proposed plants had been constructed, and an additional 25 plants were under construction. During 2007 at least 59 coal plants were cancelled, abandoned, or put on hold. In 2008 an additional 19 proposals were cancelled, abandoned, or put on hold.

Plants cancelled, abandoned, or put on hold in 2009

Since the beginning of 2009, the following proposed coal plants have been canceled, abandoned, or put on hold:

• American Municipal Power - Ohio in November 2009 announced they had abandoned the American Municipal Power Generating Station, claiming that costs were too high to move forward. In just two years, the company claimed, the price for the plant development jumped from $2.5 billion to $4 billion.

• The sponsors of Big Stone II announced that they would no longer attempt to build the plant. Sponsors cited financing difficulties due to a poor national economy and uncertainty about future federal environmental regulation, making it difficult to finance the plant.

• Air Force officials announced that they had abandoned plans to construct coal-to-liquids plants as a means of producing alternative jet fuels. The Malmstrom Air Force Base Coal-to-Liquids plant was cancelled in January, but the policy shift takes Eielson Air Force Base Coal-to-Liquids off the table as well. October 2009.

• E.ON announced it was shelving plans to build a new coal plant at Kingsnorth Power Station. The company cited the economic downturn, but said that the plant could still be built if economic conditions become more favorable within the next two to three years.

• Citing market conditions, NRG Texas Power pulled out of its plans for the proposed La Porte IGCC Plant. August 2009.

• Santee Cooper's board voted to suspend plans for the Pee Dee Generating Facility. As reasons for the cancellation, CEO Lonnie Carter cited a decrease in electricity demand related to the economic downturn and pending cap-and-trade legislation that could greatly increase the operating costs of coal-fired power plants. August 2009.

• Intermountain Power Agency officially cancelled plans for the Intermountain Power Project Unit 3 expansion in Utah. The plant was initially cancelled in July 2007, after six California cities that rely on the plant refused to support the expansion; two other cities refused power contracts with the plant earlier that year. The project was brought back to life when the Utah Associated Municipal Power System filed a lawsuit in January 2008 to force the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power to move forward with the third unit. Intermountain Power announced the lawsuit settlement and plant cancellation in July 2009.
• Northern Michigan University announced it was cancelling plans to build a 10MW coal plant and instead would switch its focus to a biomass burner.
• Basin Electric Power Cooperative told the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources that it was placing the NextGen Energy Facility on hold "because of the current regulatory, technology, and economic uncertainties." May 2009.
• Mid-Michigan Energy, a subsidiary of LS Power, announced that it was cancelling the 750-megawatt Midland Power Plant in Michigan. The company cited "regulatory and economic uncertainty." May 2009.
• Because of the current economic climate and ongoing uncertainty in federal and state regulations, Tri-State Generation and Transmission announced that it will revisit its long-term resource plan, including options for new coal-fired power plants. An unnamed Tri-State coal plant earlier included in the National Energy Technology Laboratory report "Tracking New Coal-Fired Power Plants" is now on hold. April 2009.
• The Louisiana PSC ordered Entergy Louisiana to suspend the Little Gypsy Repowering project, citing lower gas prices, escalating construction costs, and pending regulations of carbon regulations by the Obama administration. The PSC wants to discuss the economic viability of continuing the project at its next meeting in April. March 2009.
• LS Power notified Nevada state regulators that it was withdrawing its application to build White Pine Energy Station, citing economic conditions and regulatory uncertainties. Instead, LS will focus on completing a planned 500-mile transmission line project to provide new access to renewable energy resources across Nevada. March 2009.
• Alliant Energy subsidiary Interstate Power and Light Company announced that it was cancelling the proposed Sutherland Generating Station Unit 4. The company said the decision was based on a combination of factors, including the financial climate and concerns about the possibility of future regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. March 2009.
• AES announced that it had withdrawn its air permit application for a new 650MW unit at its Shady Point facility. Company spokesman Lindy Kiger explained the decision to cancel the project as "part of our broader strategy to re-evaluate our growth plans." February 2009.
• Nevada Power announced that it was postponing its Ely Energy Center indefinitely because of increasing economic and environmental uncertainties. According to CEO Michael Yackira, the plant could be delayed for up to 10 years, or until carbon capture and storage technologies are available. February 2009.
• In 2007, Alaska Power and Telephone proposed a coal plant near Jarvis Creek in Alaska but never applied for an air permit for the project. The Sierra Club designated the project cancelled in 2009.
• In 2006, Arctic Slope Regional Corporation proposed a 50-megawatt coal plant in Alaska, but it did not apply for an air permit with the state Department of Environmental Conservation. The Sierra Club designated the project cancelled in 2009.
• LS Power announced that because of the economic downturn, it was cancelling plans to build the Elk Run Energy Station in Waterloo, Iowa. A week before the cancellation, Dynegy agreed to dissolve its development venture with LS Power, in part because of the credit crisis. January 2009.
• Developers of the Highwood Generating Station in Montana voted to halt work on the coal plant, citing regulatory uncertainty and environmental lawsuits. Instead developers will pursue a 120MW plant that will be powered by natural gas with wind turbines for additional power. January 2009.
• Air Force officials announced that they had rejected construction proposals for the Malmstrom Air Force Base Coal-to-Liquids plant in Montana, and that they would no longer be pursuing development of the large synthetic fuel plant. January 2009.