Burgas-Alexandroupolis Oil Pipeline

From SourceWatch
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is part of the Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker, a project of Global Energy Monitor and the Center for Media and Democracy.

Burgas-Alexandroupolis Oil Pipeline is a proposed oil pipeline in Bulgaria and Greece.[1]


The pipeline would run from the Black Sea Port in Burgas, Bulgaria, to Alexandroupoli, Greece.

Loading map...

Project Details

  • Operator: Transneft, Rosneft, Gazprom, Technoexportstroy, Hellenic Petroleum, Prometheus Gas, Latsis Group, Government of Greece[1]
  • Proposed capacity: 700,000 barrels per day
  • Length: 279 kilometers
  • Status: Cancelled


The Burgas–Alexandroupoli pipeline was a proposed oil pipeline project for transportation of Russian and Caspian oil from the Bulgarian Black Sea port of Burgas to the Greek Aegean port of Alexandroupoli. It was seen as an alternative route for Russian oil, bypassing the Bosporus and the Dardanelles. However, in December 2011 the project was suspended by the Bulgarian government due to environmental and supply concerns.[2]


The pipeline project was proposed in 1993–1994 by several Russian and Greek companies.[3] In 1994, for construction of the pipeline Greece and Bulgaria signed a bilateral agreement, followed by a memorandum of cooperation, signed by Greece and Russia.[4]

In February 1998, a Greek consortium for pipeline construction named Bapline was established, and in May 1998, a memorandum of creation of the Transbalkan Oil Pipeline Company was signed.[4] In 2000, a technical specifications and an economic evaluation of the project were prepared by the German company ILF.[3]

A joint protocol for preparing the pipeline's construction was signed by the three countries in January 2005.[5] The political memorandum between governments was signed on 12 April 2005. An inter-governmental agreement on the project was agreed on 7 February 2007, and it was signed on 15 March 2007 in Athens, by the relevant ministers of the three countries, in the presence of their leaders, Vladimir Putin (Russian president), Sergey Stanishev (Bulgarian prime-minister), and Kostas Karamanlis (prime-minister of Greece).[6][7] The agreement establishing the international project company was signed in Moscow on 18 December 2007 and the company—Trans-Balkan Pipeline B.V.—was incorporated in the Netherlands on 6 February 2008.[8][9]

Construction of the pipeline was scheduled to start in October 2009, and was estimated to be completed by 2011.[10] However, the project was delayed as the Bulgarian government coming to power in July 2009 started to reconsider its participation in the project.[11] On 19 October 2009, Italy, Russia and Turkey signed an inter-governmental agreement agreeing the participation of Russian oil companies in the competing Samsun-Ceyhan pipeline project.[12] On 11 June 2010, Prime Minister of Bulgaria Boyko Borisov announced that Bulgaria would not participate in the project to due strong opposition from the local population of Burgas. Later it was said that the government would await an environmental impact assessment before making a final decision about termination of the project.[13] On 7 December 2011, the Bulgarian government officially decided to terminate its participation in the project and proposed that the tripartite inter-governmental agreement be terminated by mutual consent.[2][14]

Technical features and financing

The main pipeline with a diameter of 36 inches (900 mm) would be 279 kilometres (173 mi) long, and it would transport 15-23 million tons of oil per year during the first phase, as well as 35 million during the second.[3] The pipeline would have three oil refilling stations, two of which in Bulgaria (the first one at Neftochim close to Burgas) and one at Alexandroupoli. The project included reconstruction of Burgas and Alexandroupolis terminals, including oil tanks with a capacity of 600,000 tons in Burgas, and 1,200,000 tons in Alexandroupolis.[15]

The pipeline was expected to cost up to €1 billion.[16] The investment scheme was not agreed, and it was not decided from which sources the pipeline would be filled.[7]

International project company

The pipeline was to be constructed and owned by the Dutch-registered Trans-Balkan Pipeline B.V.[9] In this company, a stake of 51% of shares belongs to the Burgas–Alexandroupolis Pipeline Consortium, a joint venture of Russian Transneft, Rosneft and Gazprom Neft.[17] Bulgarian Burgas–Alexandroupolis Project Company-BG, a subsidiary of Technoexportstroy, owns 24.5% of shares. Greece consortium HELPE S.A. - THRAKI S.A., a joint venture between Hellenic Petroleum and Thraki, which is owned by Prometheus Gas and the Latsis Group, owns 23.5%, while the Government of Greece has 1%.[18]

There were speculations that the part of Bulgarian and Hellenic stakes could be sold to other oil companies as Chevron, TNK-BP and KazMunayGas.[7] Also Andrei Dementyev, a deputy industry and energy minister of Russia, has proposed that Kazakhstani KazMunayGas and other shareholders of the Caspian Pipeline Consortium could get a stake in the project.[19] Kazakhstan's Energy Minister Baktykozha Izmukhambetov had said that Kazakhstan wants to buy a stake in the pipeline consortium.[20]


Photo credit: Novinite, http://bit.ly/2xUK23S.

There were several competitive pipeline projects, such as the AMBO pipeline from Burgas to Vlorë, Pan-European Pipeline from Constanţa to Trieste, Odessa-Brody-Plotsk pipeline, Kiykoy-Ibrice pipeline, and Samsun-Ceyhan pipeline — all aimed to transport oil from the Black Sea bypassing Turkish straits. The Burgas–Alexandroupoli pipeline was described as one of the shortest routes through a plain terrain and therefore was considered to offer a cost advantage.[15]

The Burgas–Alexandroupoli pipeline project raises environmental concerns particularly related to oil tanker traffic in the Aegean Sea, which contains numerous submerged rocks and island populations dependent on tourism and fishing.[21] Moreover, an oil spill in the Aegean would likely devastate Greece's tourism industry.[22] In addition, there is significant local opposition to the project, with the residents of Burgas and Sozopol in Bulgaria voting against in the pipeline in local referendums in the spring of 2008.[23]


More than 300 residents of the Meden Rudnik district of the Bulgarian Black Sea city of Burgas protested the pipeline at a February 2008 rally organized by the Civic Committee for the Rescue of the Burgas Gulf.[24] Protester slogans included, "Down with the corrupt politicians", "No to the oil pipeline", "We want transparency", "Don't turn Burgas into a second Chernobyl."[24]

Approximately 100 residents of Pomorie protested the pipeline in April 2009 at a rally in front of the construction ministry in Sofia.[25]

Articles and resources


  1. 1.0 1.1 Burgas-Alexandroupolis Oil Pipeline , Wikipedia, accessed September 2017
  2. 2.0 2.1 "World media about Bulgari's decision on Burgas-Alexandroupolis oil pipeline (Review)" (2011-12-07). Retrieved on 2011-12-07. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 "Burgas-Alexandrupolis Pipeline Project", Transneft. Retrieved on 2007-02-15. Archived from the original on 2006-10-04. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Peggy Papakosta. "Everybody wins", Bridge Magazine. Retrieved on 2007-02-15. Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. 
  5. "Greece, Russia, Bulgaria move closer to building Burgas–Alexandroupoli pipeline", Embassy of Greece to the United States (2005-01-29). Retrieved on 2006-05-07. Archived from the original on 2007-03-11. 
  6. "Bulgaria, Greece, Russia finalize details on long-awaited pipeline deal", Associated Press (2007-02-06). Retrieved on 2008-02-24. Archived from the original on 2008-03-06. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 "Burgas–Alexandroupolis project getting underway, but many questions remain", RBC Daily (2007-02-08). Retrieved on 2007-02-15. 
  8. "Trans-Balkan partners form operator," Upstream Online, 2007-12-18
  9. 9.0 9.1 "Norton Rose Group advises on Burgas–Alexandroupolis pipeline project", Norton Rose Group (2008-03-05). Retrieved on 2008-06-12. Archived from the original on 2008-11-17. 
  10. "Trans-Balkan Oil Pipeline Hit By Delays", Downstream Today (2008-10-17). Retrieved on 2009-03-15. 
  11. "Bulgaria bins trans-Balkan pipe plan," Upstream Online, 2010-06-11
  12. Stephen Jewkes (2009-10-19). "Russia to supply oil to Samsun-Ceyhan pipeline". Retrieved on 2009-10-24. 
  13. Tsvetelia Tsolova; Irina Ivanova (2010-06-11). "Bulgaria likely to abandon trans-Balkan oil pipeline". Retrieved on 2010-06-12. 
  14. "Bulgaria Abandons Burgas-Alexandroupolis Oil Pipeline" (2011-12-07). Retrieved on 2011-12-07. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 Template:Cite paper
  16. "Russia agrees to speed up Balkan oil pipeline project", International Herald Tribune (2006-09-04). Retrieved on 2006-09-23. 
  17. "Transneft, Rosneft and Gazprom Neft set up consortium", RBC News (2007-02-10). Retrieved on 2007-02-14. 
  18. "State of registration for Bourgas-Alexandroupolis oil pipeline project company to be proposed within week", BSANNA News (2007-07-13). Retrieved on 2008-03-05. 
  19. "Russia makes proposal on final trans-Balkan pipeline agreement", RIA Novosti (2006-11-21). Retrieved on 2008-02-24. 
  20. "Balkan pipeline talks on table," Upstream Online, 2007-04-19
  21. "Time to wake up from South-East Europe’s pipeline dreams" (2006-03-03). Bankwatch Mail (27). CEE Bankwatch Network. Retrieved on 2007-02-15. 
  22. "AMBO Trans-Balkan Pipeline Agreement Finally Signed", Balkananalysis.com (2004-12-29). Retrieved on 2007-02-15. 
  23. "Burgas–Alexandroupolis Construction Set To Start Next Year", Downstream Today (2008-06-09). Retrieved on 2008-06-12. 
  24. 24.0 24.1 300 Protest Against Burgas-Alexandroupolis Oil Pipeline, Novinite, 20 Feb. 2008
  25. Bulgarians rally against trans-Balkan oil pipeline, Reuters, 22 Apr. 2009

Related SourceWatch articles

External resources

Wikipedia also has an article on Burgas–Alexandroupoli pipeline. This article may use content from the Wikipedia article under the terms of the GFDL.

External articles