Greenpeace and Carbon Capture and Storage

Learn more from the Center for Media and Democracy's research on climate change.

This article is part of the Coal Issues portal on SourceWatch, a project of Global Energy Monitor and the Center for Media and Democracy. See here for help on adding material to CoalSwarm.

Greenpeace disputes the suggestion that Carbon Capture and Storage technology should be a priority in a comprehensive strategy for addressing global warming.

Articles and Resources

Related SourceWatch Articles

• Carbon Capture and Storage
• Clean Development Mechanism and Carbon Capture and Storage

External Articles

Greenpeace Submissions and Reports on Carbon Capture and Storage

• Greenpeace International, "Long-term physical leakage (seepage) levels of risks and uncertainty", Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2006.
• Greenpeace International, "Long-term liability for storage sites", Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2006.
• Greenpeace International, "Long-term responsibility for monitoring the reservoir and any remediation measures that may be necessary after the end of the crediting period", Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2006.
• Greenpeace International, "Carbon dioxide capture and storage in geological formations as clean development mechanism project activities", Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2007.

This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.