Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline
| This article is part of the Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker, a project of Global Energy Monitor and the Center for Media and Democracy. |
| Sub-articles: |
Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline is a proposed natural gas pipeline in Oregon, USA.[1]
Contents
Location
The pipeline would run from Malin, Oregon, to the proposed Jordan Cove LNG terminal in Coos Bay, Oregon.
Project Details
- Operator: Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline
- Parent Company: Veresen Inc.
- Current capacity:
- Proposed capacity: 1200 Million cubic feet per day
- Length: 232 miles / 373 km
- Status: Proposed
- Start Year: 2024
Background
The Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline would carry natural gas from near Malin, Oregon, to the proposed Jordan Cove LNG Terminal in Coos Bay, OR, allowing for the export of fracked natural gas from the Rocky Mountains.[2] Veresen Inc. first submitted an application to FERC to build the pipeline in June 2013. This application and a May 2013 application to build the Jordan Cove LNG Facility in Coos Bay, OR, were rejected in March 2016,[3] marking the first time in its history that FERC had rejected a proposal to build a pipeline.[4] FERC's rejection stated that the company had failed to demonstrate a need for the pipeline and that the two projects were not "required by the public convenience."[3] In December 2016 FERC rejected a request by Veresen to reconsider its March 2016 denial of the pipeline and LNG facility.[5]
In April 2017, Gary Cohn, the new Director of President Trump's National Economic Council declared, "The first thing we’re going to do is we’re going to permit an LNG export facility in the Northwest."[6] As noted by The Washington Post, it is unclear what Cohn meant by "we're going to permit" given that approval of the project must come from FERC.[6] In September 2017 Veresen announced that it had applied again to build the pipeline and LNG facility, with a planned in-service date of 2024 for both.[7] "There’s a good chance that the FERC will take a different stance under this administration," said Chris Cox, equity analyst at Raymond James Ltd, in a Sep. 21, 2017 article in Bloomberg News.[8]
In May of 2019, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality denied a Clean Water Act permit for a natural gas pipeline and export facility in Southern Oregon. DEQ said Pembina failed to demonstrate that construction and maintenance of the pipeline and export facility wouldn’t harm waterways and fish habitat. The project could increase erosion and landslide hazards, DEQ said in an evaluation and findings report. Pembina can apply again and submit new information to address the reasons for the denial, but opponents of the project called the denial a potentially fatal blow to the project, which is also being reviewed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. DEQ officials said they received approximately 42,000 public comments during the agency’s review of the project.[9]
In June of 2019, Jordan Cove announced that it has secured 82% of easements with landowners along its proposed pipeline route. These easements, voluntarily signed by property owners along the pipeline route, allow Jordan Cove to run its proposed pipeline underneath those properties with the permission of the landowner, marking an important victory for pipeline owners.[10]
Opposition
The pipeline and LNG facility have been opposed by residents, landowners, and conservation groups. Landowners along the route proposed in 2013 testified to FERC that the pipeline would negatively impact land values, farming, timber operations, and oyster harvesting.[11]
In September 2016 the Klamath Tribal Council issued a letter in opposition to the project.[5] In October 2016 members of local tribes and the Karuk Tribe of California staged a protest of the projects in Klamath Falls, OR.[5] Chief Walking Eagle Thom, of the Karuk Tribe, said the pipeline was “all about money” and said such greed was “like a disease.”[5] In March 2017, approximately 200-400 protesters gathered in Medford, OR, to protest attempts to revive the pipeline and LNG facility, including members of the Yurok, Hoopa, Karuk, Modoc, and Klamath Tribes of northern California and southern Oregon.[12] Thomas Joseph II of the Hoopla tribe stated: "“We live on 10,000 year-old ancestral land along the Trinity River, which is a tributary of the Klamath River. What affects the Klamath affects us.”[12]
In December 2017 U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR), a previous supporter of the pipeline and LNG facility, announced his opposition to the two projects in an op-ed in the Medford Mail Tribune, citing the pollution they would generate in Oregon and in countries to which natural gas was exported.[13] "In 2012 the company touted its intention to procure clean, offshore wind energy to help power the terminal. That option is no longer on the table. As now planned, the terminal would become the largest carbon polluter in Oregon, with emissions equivalent to putting half a million gas-powered cars on the road. And it is no longer true that the LNG shipped to Asia would reduce pollution. Since 2012 we have learned more about natural gas escaping from fracking fluids and gas pipelines, which by many estimates makes it at least as carbon-polluting as coal. When that LNG is burned in Asia, it would generate carbon pollution equal to an additional 3 million gas-powered cars on the road. Additionally, global energy markets have evolved dramatically. Non-carbon alternatives such as solar and wind are now highly competitive. With a renewable energy future within reach, it makes little sense to help Asia leap from coal to natural gas, locking in carbon pollution for decades."[13]
In January 2018 a report by Oil Change International found that the pipeline and LNG facility project would result in over 36.8 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per year.[14] The report also stated that the two projects would "make it impossible to achieve Oregon Governor Kate Brown’s goal to have Oregon’s climate reductions line-up with the targets of the Paris Accords, as well as the emission reduction goals enshrined by the Oregon legislature in 2007.[14]
Articles and resources
References
- ↑ Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, Veresen, accessed September 2017
- ↑ Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline - About The Project, Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, accessed January 2018
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 https://www.ferc.gov/CalendarFiles/20160311154932-CP13-483-000.pdf, FERC, Mar. 11, 2016
- ↑ Pipeline plan rejected by federal regulators in shocking decision Penn Live, Mar. 12, 2016
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 FERC rejects Jordan Cove appeal, Herald and Mail, Dec. 13, 2016
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Top Trump adviser calls for reviving controversial natural gas project on Oregon’s coast, Washington Post, Apr. 21, 2017
- ↑ Veresen Announces Filing of FERC Applications for Jordan Cove Energy Project and Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, Veresen, accessed January 2018
- ↑ Twice-Rejected U.S. LNG Exporter Gives Project Another Shot, Bloomberg News, Sep. 21, 2017
- ↑ DEQ denies permit for gas pipeline Mail Tribune, accessed May 2019
- ↑ Nicholas Johnson Jordan Cove claims 82% landowner support for LNG project The Bulletin, June 22, 2019
- ↑ Feds will not reconsider their denial of Jordan Cove LNG terminal in Coos Bay, The Oregonian, Dec. 9, 2016
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA & SOUTHERN OREGON TRIBES PROTEST THE JORDAN COVE LNG PIPELINE, Native News Online, Apr. 8, 2017
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Guest Opinion: We can create infrastructure jobs without jeopardizing our future, Medford Mail Tribune, Dec. 7, 2017
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Jordan Cove LNG and Pacific Connector Pipeline Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Oil Change International, Jan. 11, 2018 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "OCI" defined multiple times with different content
